Wednesday, March 25, 2015

English Landscape Designers and Innovators

The English Landscape Movement was a re-evaluation of nature. After the Baroque style, English landscape style became popular. This style was based on many things, but mostly on landscape paintings and nature.

Charles Bridgeman was a landscapist during the early 1700’s whose work got overlaid. He broke the bounds of formality and started the whole landscape scene. He united the garden and landscape. His style was a mix of English landscape design and baroque. It was 1. very traditional with parterres, avenues, and geometric lakes. 2. Transitional with garden buildings, lawns, and amphitheaters. 3. Progressive using rides and key vantage points. Bridgeman introduced the design of the garden no longer being walled in. His single greatest contribution to English landscape gardens was the Ha-Ha. This is a sunken hedge at the edge of the garden that looks out to the borrowed landscape. It is apart of the visual landscape. One example of Bridgeman’s work is the Kensington Palace. You can see the transitional style with the wiggly lines, and how it is starting to become softer and more gentle than the baroque gardens.
Kensington Palace Garden Design

William Kent was a painter in the early-mid 1700’s who REALLY broke the bounds of formality. He focused on art and nature combined. He made gardens that looked like paintings. They were very informal. Stowe is an example of this because it is very picturesque. His inspirations were from natural settings. Kent wanted to generate an emotional response in his art. He used classically inspired landscapes of buildings and themes in his paintings, so they were a real live representation. An example of his work is Rousham in Oxford. In this garden he created something in the landscape (like the statues and wall below) just to draw attention and be more artistic. Today it is a real hidden gem. 

Stowe Garden



Rousham Garden

‘Capability’ Brown was an architect and a gardener. His name comes from having “great capabilities” when designing. He worked with Kent and created Stowe. His style was elegant, comfortable and subtle. He used trees, grass, topography and water. He believed landscape should be large scale and he is known for not only having a garden but having a parkland, woods, and a farm within distance of the garden. He often used rivers or lakes that extended through his garden and used Ha-Ha’s to trick the eye into thinking the borrowed landscape was part of the parkland. Beyond the trees he usually had a focal point, a random temple or bridge to give a natural scene. This is shown in Blenheim Palace, one of his most extraordinary pieces of work.

Bleinham Palace Garden
For more information on Bridgeman, Kent, or Brown I have provided interesting links at the bottom of the page where I got some of my information. It is worthwhile to learn more about these designers.
Sources:





About the Men:


Monday, March 16, 2015

Versailles Palace and Gardens


King Louis XIV was the longest European monarch on reign today. He is very well known by Europeans and by the world because of the palace of Versailles. Before the palace of Versailles, there was a palace built called the Vaux-le-Vicomte. This palace had the first baroque gardens. King Louis XIV wanted something grandeur and better than Vaux-le-Vicomte. He found a hunting lodge in Versailles built by Louis XIII and decided to expand it so he had the palace of Versailles built. Where the garden terrace used to be for the hunting lodge, made way for the hall of mirrors where the king “radiated his power and the destiny of Europe was decided over a century.”
Vaux-le-Vicomte
Although Versailles influence was pan-European, it was all about France. The baroque style garden affected the all of Europe and many gardens today are based off of the Versailles gardens. King Louis XIV made Versailles known to the world for civilization and pleasure. There are many features in the gardens that serve a purpose. The orangerie, or citrus trees, were planted for smell, color, and of course fruit. The bosquets made it feel like visitors were surrounded by woodlands, and the Bassin d’ Apollon fountain referenced the Sun King, Apollo because King Louis XIV often referred to himself as this. 
Bassin d’ Apollon
These features were all built to show how well France was doing at the time and to show that King Louis XIV is important. Versailles was mainly built as a statement of kingly power and to show French wealth. It was also built for security. King Louis XIV wanted his own place that was safe outside of Paris and Versailles was the perfect location. Versailles is also a garden of control, or a golden cage for King Louis to lock in the noblemen. All of the noblemen lived in Versailles so King Louis XIV had control of them and could keep them all in one place because he had trust issues with them. There were many concerts, theaters, pleasure grounds, and entertainment to keep the noblemen happy, busy, and again, under control. Finally, Versailles was a garden of government. It was the seat of power from 1682 and all of the ruling was done there with King Louis XIV.
(The enormous) Versailles
One tiny part of the Versailles garden. You can see the Baroque style
Because of the enormous size of the baroque style gardens of Versailles, its beauty, and all it has to offer, many European countries have based their gardens off of this one. One garden I visited during my travels was the Schonbrunn Palace and gardens in Vienna, Austria. As I have been to Versailles in the past, I was able to draw comparisons to the Schonbrunn and Versailles. They are both massive, intricate, and have many statues, and water features. It was very interesting to make these comparisons after seeing the first Baroque style garden (Versailles) and then seeing one that was based off of that (Schonbrunn).
Schonbrunn Palace and Gardens

For more information on Versailles, I found this page with TONS of useful and interesting information!

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

Italian Renaissance vs. Northern Renaissance

How are the Italian renaissance gardens similar and different from the northern renaissance gardens (specifically the low countries: Netherlands, Belgium)?

Italian renaissance gardens were dominated by architecture, sculpture, water, and message-laden landscapes. People believed these gardens were structurally all God’s work. Nature was very animate in the gardens. They were organized and imitated by man’s art. The gardens had an axial alignment that was arranged due to the size of the garden, either small or large. There were terraces in Italian renaissance gardens that could be viewed from outside of the garden. The planting was much more intricate than it is today with beds with low hedges, fountains, and trees. Beds were usually only planted with one type of plant that was used to show off. Water was also a huge part of Italian renaissance gardens. These gardens usually had many fountains or sources of water throughout. There were also several parts to the gardens. For example, Villa Lante in 1566 (picture below) had a hunting park, grove, and a paradise area to relax.
Villa Lante
Northern renaissance gardens were west of the alps. Unlike the Italian renaissance gardens being a relationship between God, Man, and nature, the low countries had renaissance gardens that were used to show what the people and country was going through at the time. The Netherlands was at war so their gardens had their own peculiar style. They had little time to work on their gardens until after the war when they used color with bulbs and tulips and lots of ornamentation. Much like Italian renaissance gardens, these gardens had a central water feature, and fountains. They also had terraces surrounding and beds at different levels. You can see in the photo below the brightly colored flowers and ornamentation.
Het Loo Palace (Netherlands)
Belgium’s renaissance gardens were very formal, political, and neoclassical. One garden in Belgium had an astronomical observatory in the garden to show planets at the time, and many had rose gardens and colorful flowers to show the flower advancements of the time. Like the Italian renaissance gardens, many gardens also have a water statue in the center and a gallery of water works. You can see the colorful flowers and formal structure of the Belgium gardens here.
The royal palace and Brussels park
The northern renaissance gardens (Netherlands and Belgium) seem to be more baroque style, while Italian renaissance gardens are more of a cascading, hillside garden in nature. Although, I haven’t yet studied baroque gardens, I did some research to find baroque gardens were used for show and the designers drew upon latest developments, much like in the Netherlands and Belgium renaissance style gardens. For more information on Baroque style gardens and to make comparisons to these gardens, I have added a link below.